New Platform Papers No 1, Currency House, November 2021.
Contact: 
Martin Portus Phone 0401 360 806 
mportus2@tpg.com.au 
Preview by 
Frank McKoneThe Platform Papers series published by Currency House, previously directed by 
Katharine Brisbane, is taking a new approach, under the new General Editor, theatre director and academic 
Julian MeyrickKatharine
 provides in her Christmas Greetings an outline of changes, especially 
in the status of women, that have taken place over the two decades of 
her leadership in setting up Currency House, following her stepping down
 as publisher of Currency Press.
Rather than each Platform Paper 
being an essay by a single expert contributor, this New Platform Paper 
contains five papers, with additional material:
No 1. Imagination, the Arts and Economics  Introduction: A Snail May Put His Horns Out, 
Harriet Parsons  Models, Uncertainty and Imagination in Economics, 
Richard Bronk  What’s Wrong with Cannibalism? 
Jonathan Biggins and 
John Quiggin  
You Can Sing (Averagely)!
 Astrid Jorgensen  Afterword: Looking Back and Looking Forwards, 
Ian MaxwellRather
 than offer a summary of the complex arguments and practical experiences
 presented by such a variety show of commentators, here is a selection 
of quotes which hopefully will stir your social, political and artistic 
interests and knowledge.
Julian Meyrick explains:
The
 first issue of the New Platform Papers published in this volume arose 
out of an event which will be central to the series from now on, an 
annual Authors’ Convention. The Convention itself was the initiative of 
my colleague, the new Director of Currency House and Katharine’s 
daughter, Harriet Parsons. A brilliant addition to our activities, the 
Convention is a two-day public gathering where we invite the authors of 
Platform Papers to come together to reflect on a given theme.
Harriet Parsons (Wurundjeri country)
Introduction: A Snail May Put His Horns Out
We
 have to decide what changes we are willing to make if we are to plan a 
route, not just out of the pandemic, but off the dangerous course we 
have been following for the past forty years. The arts may seem an 
unlikely point man for this operation. We have become more like a snail 
than a butterfly, withdrawn inside the protection of its shell, but as 
the eighteenth-century radical Thomas Spence once wrote, ‘a snail may 
put his horns out’.
 
This first volume of the New Platform 
Papers is devoted to exploring how our imaginations became captives of 
the ‘dismal science’, and the role the arts can play in leading the way 
out.
Richard Bronk (United Kingdom)
Models, Uncertainty and Imagination in Economics
The
 coordination properties of models and their associated narratives—their
 tendency when internalised to frame expectations and influence 
behaviour and outcomes—makes them an instrument of corporate or 
government power. And this power may—initially at least—be in inverse 
proportion to the degree of humility with which the narrative or model 
is promulgated.
The poet, Percy Bysshe Shelley, underlined the role of imagination in sympathy and therefore morality in his Defence of Poetry:
A
 man, to be greatly good, must imagine intensely and comprehensively; he
 must put himself in the place of another and of many others; the pains 
and pleasures of his species must become his own. The great instrument 
of the moral good is the imagination—and poetry administers to the 
effect by acting upon the cause.
 
Such sympathetic 
identification with the plight of others is often seen as the 
quintessential opposite of the narrow self-interest of homo economicus.
…we
 all have no choice but to imagine the future, interpret the creative 
interpretations that others place on their predicaments, and invent new 
ways of making sense of our own.
Jonathan Biggins and John Quiggin (Awabakal and Worimi country / Turrbal and Jagera country)
What’s Wrong with Cannibalism?
Jonathan Swift’s essay A Modest Proposal
 was prompted by the British national debt crisis of 1729. Having 
offered conventional solutions in a number of essays, he turned to 
satire in frustration, proposing that landlords eat the children of 
their poor tenants: 
I grant this food will be somewhat dear, and 
therefore very proper for landlords, who, as they have already devoured 
most of the parents, seem to have the best title to the children …
 
Swift’s
 A Modest Proposal seems, yes, a ludicrous idea, but then look at 
Airbnb, where you monetise your family home. The home was the sacred 
hearth of the family. But then someone came up with the idea of selling 
part of it to strangers on a nightly basis. We recently toured to Orange
 in regional New South Wales. It has 364 Airbnbs, but no-one can rent a 
house there.
At an artistic level, much of our cultural policy
 is now being dictated by social media platforms, and artists are 
increasingly self-censoring. We were recently told not to portray 
non-Caucasian characters in the Wharf Revue. We were portraying Xi 
Jinping and Kim Jong-un, two of the most powerful people in the world. I
 find it extraordinary that satirists are now being told who they can 
and can’t offend. I would have thought the point was to offend 
everybody.
Harriet Parsons asks:  So is the universal basic income the answer for the arts?
JQ: 
 I’m certainly a proponent of a version of the universal basic income, 
which is the level of income guarantee, which would include a basic 
living standard for artists engaged in creative work. It differs in the 
sense that you don’t give it to Gina Rinehart and try to extract it back
 through taxes, you only expand the provision of basic incomes. But that
 would provide a basic income to anybody who wanted to apply themselves 
to creative work. That is something we could and should do.
Astrid Jorgensen (Turrbal and Jagera country)
You Can Sing (Averagely)!
I
 could not wrap my head around the fact that teenagers were spending 
every second of their lives consumed by music while simultaneously 
proclaiming to hate Music, the subject. They would walk into the 
classroom with their favourite singer blasting in their headphones, then
 take the headphones out, slump in their chair and despise singing with 
me for 50 minutes. I started to worry that I was ruining music-making 
for children, which was a heavy burden to bear.
[Astrid left 
school teaching to set up the well-known Pub Choir, which in the 
pandemic lockdowns became Couch Choir online, attracting participants 
from all over the world.]
But there was one thing still 
bothering me. None of these choirs reflected me in any way. Each of my 
seven choirs were either made up of kids forced to sing by their 
parents, or were mostly white, semi-retirees. There is nothing 
unpleasant about working with either group. But as a 20-something Asian 
woman myself, it was confusing to me that none of my peers wanted to 
sing.
So in 2017, after years of friends declining to sing with 
me, I wrote a list. On it, I put every excuse I’d ever heard about what 
stopped somebody from joining a choir:
Auditions
Time commitment
Having to compete/perform
Reading sheet music
Unfamiliar repertoire
General choir lameness
Having a bad singing voice.
I determined to solve all of these roadblocks. Thus, Pub Choir was born.
Not
 always in a pub, the trademarked name, Pub Choir, describes my musical 
act. It’s a ticketed show during which I transform an audience—any 
audience—into a functional choir.
I believe that Pub Choir 
gives people the opportunity to embrace and value mediocrity and truly, 
madly, deeply embrace their averageness. There is a freedom in a crowd 
where you are genuinely unimportant. Nobody believes that they have 
become a better singer at Pub Choir. They just feel less afraid to share
 whatever horrible voice they have. If one person forgets what to sing, 
someone nearby will remember. Some people sing flat, some sing sharp, 
some sing too early, some too late and the overall effect is a rich, 
full, electrifying average. Our audiences reclaim music-making back into
 their lives, realising that singing belonged to them all along.
The diversity within Couch Choir
 participants was remarkable. In one song we had 5,000 participants from
 45 countries. We received submissions from places we had never 
considered visiting, like Kazakhstan and Norway. People sent videos from
 their farms, their wheelchairs, from houseboats, using sign language. 
They were younger, older, more colourful. Couch Choir was the 
distillation of what I had always hoped Pub Choir would be: regular, 
diverse people feeling personally empowered to contribute to the whole.
Sure,
 it’s not peer-reviewed research, it’s just 613 people who chose to 
participate. But when 100 per cent of them self-report that their mental
 health is improved by joining in, it’s worth taking note. Singing—even 
online—made them feel happier, more connected and more hopeful. And they
 thought it was an experience worth fighting for. Art has always been 
more than just entertainment or a distraction. Art can heal us.
Ian Maxwell (Cadigal and Darramuragal country)
Afterword: Looking Back and Looking Forwards
Exhaustion,
 then, is integral to the [arts] field at the best of times. In the 
context of the acute crisis of the current Covid-19 epidemic, the arts 
eat their young…. [leading to] three questions, which were put to the 
Convention for further discussion. Four key themes emerged. First, the 
proposition that art and culture are fundamental to the sustainability 
of society; second, that those engaged in the fields of art and culture 
do not have the capital to support them; third, that the arts are 
exhausted; and fourth, that its professionals have been pitted against 
each other in the competition for resources, with the result that the 
sector has become fragmented and unable to advocate for its interests as
 a whole.
Ambiguity is the strength of art, as well as its 
weakness. Historically—indeed from Plato onwards—the protean, 
make-believe, liminal nature of theatre—and the recent genres that take 
up the even more equivocal trope of ‘performance’—has generated profound
 anxiety and moral panics.
Our challenge is to resist 
reprising old arguments that belong to the past, and instead peer 
through the lens of new experiences with the eye of imagination. That, I
 hope, is the project Currency House has set before us, and towards 
which the inaugural Convention of 2021 has made the critical first step.
For interviews, review or purchase, please contact Martin Portus.
© Frank McKone, Canberra